Curriculum trust

Review queue

Track which starter-map concepts have been checked by a teacher, subject expert, safeguarding reviewer or curriculum lead before Aristotle treats them as trusted learning material.

Curriculum audit Readiness

8 concepts in scope

0 expert-reviewed

8 pending review

0 need revision

0 blocked from trust

0% approved coverage

0/1 subject scopes ready

Review campaign

Whole-curriculum expert review plan

Coordinate the full EYFS through A-Level expert-review campaign as traceable subject batches, then import returned decisions before recording validation evidence.

768 concept reviews open

64 estimated batches

126 subject scopes open

12 concepts per batch

Campaign steps

Assign priority subjects first, starting with blocked and needs-revision scopes.
Send each reviewer the subject work order, batch JSON and review pack route for their assigned scope.
Import returned decision JSON in the curriculum review workspace; malformed batches must not partially save.
Repeat until every subject scope has zero open concepts, then draft subject-expert validation evidence.
Record external or real-world attestation in the validation registry before claiming production trust.

This campaign plan organizes expert-review work. It does not create approvals, replace subject experts or close the subject-expert Definition of Done gate without imported reviewer decisions and accepted validation evidence.

Reviewer dispatch queue

Coordinate subject-expert dispatch without exposing learner data or claiming approval before reviews return.

Dispatch A-Level / Mathematics first; 8 concept(s) remain open.
Prepare reviewer packets for 23 further subject scope(s).

pending

A-Level / Mathematics

The subject scope has concepts that have not yet been checked by a subject expert.

Workspace

pending

EYFS / Mathematics

The subject scope has concepts that have not yet been checked by a subject expert.

Workspace

pending

GCSE / Key Stage 4 / Mathematics

The subject scope has concepts that have not yet been checked by a subject expert.

Workspace

pending

Key Stage 1 / Mathematics

The subject scope has concepts that have not yet been checked by a subject expert.

Workspace

pending

Key Stage 2 / Mathematics

The subject scope has concepts that have not yet been checked by a subject expert.

Workspace

pending

Key Stage 3 / Mathematics

The subject scope has concepts that have not yet been checked by a subject expert.

Workspace

Safe reviewer message

Aristotle expert review request: A-Level / Mathematics

Hello [reviewer name], please review the Aristotle curriculum slice for A-Level / Mathematics. Use [work order link] and [batch JSON link] to inspect objectives, prerequisites, misconceptions, worked examples, rubrics, remediation and progression links. Return the completed decision JSON through the curriculum review workspace. Use approved only when the concepts can support trusted teaching for the stated age and subject scope.

Dispatch guardrail

The dispatch plan contains subject-scope counts, route references and placeholder reviewer copy only.

This dispatch plan creates reviewer assignments only. It does not approve curriculum content, replace subject experts or close the validation gate without imported decisions and accepted validation evidence.

Priority scope	Open	Batches	Next action
A-Level / Mathematics	8	1	Send the open concept batch to a subject expert for review.
EYFS / Mathematics	8	1	Send the open concept batch to a subject expert for review.
GCSE / Key Stage 4 / Mathematics	8	1	Send the open concept batch to a subject expert for review.
Key Stage 1 / Mathematics	8	1	Send the open concept batch to a subject expert for review.
Key Stage 2 / Mathematics	8	1	Send the open concept batch to a subject expert for review.
Key Stage 3 / Mathematics	8	1	Send the open concept batch to a subject expert for review.
A-Level / Accounting	6	1	Send the open concept batch to a subject expert for review.
A-Level / Ancient history	6	1	Send the open concept batch to a subject expert for review.

Expert review launch pack

Production trust review gate

Use this handoff to coordinate reviewer coverage from EYFS through A-Level before Aristotle makes production-trusted teaching claims.

Ready structural curriculum

0/8 concepts approved

8 concept reviews open

1 subject scopes open

0 accepted validation records

Open production trust gate

Open trust claim

This launch pack does not create expert approval by itself. Aristotle should treat the scope as open until live concept reviews, accepted validation evidence and the production trust gate are all complete.

Required review loop

Reviewer identity and role: Every decision identifies an accountable teacher, subject expert, safeguarding reviewer or curriculum lead.
External or real-world attestation: The accepted validation record confirms evidence is external or real-world and not synthetic-only.
Full UK education scope: Review coverage spans all MVP stages and subjects from EYFS through A-Level, with age-scoped expectations intact.
Concept accuracy and fundamentals: Objectives, explanations, worked examples and representative problems accurately teach the core of the subject.
Prerequisite sequence: Prerequisites, progression links and extension paths form a coherent learning route for the stated age group.
Misconceptions and remediation: Common errors, feedback, remediation and stretch work are specific enough for Aristotle to respond safely.
Assessment rubric: Rubric dimensions, mastery signals and evidence prompts can measure understanding rather than completion alone.
Blocked content triage: Blocked and revision-needed concepts are repaired or kept out of production-trusted teaching until re-reviewed.
Validation registry acceptance: A subject-expert review record is accepted with no open handoff gaps before a production trust claim is made.

Next actions

Send 8 pending concept(s) to subject experts in traceable batches.
Start with GCSE / Key Stage 4 / Mathematics, where 8 concept(s) remain open.

Acceptance rules

Structural curriculum audit: The EYFS-to-A-Level curriculum map has no missing metadata for concepts, prerequisites, rubrics or progression links.
Live expert review coverage: Every concept in the claimed scope has a latest approved CurriculumReview decision.
Accepted validation evidence: The validation registry contains an accepted subject-expert review record with external or real-world attestation.
Production trust gate: Expert-reviewed-only teaching is enabled in the target environment before production trust claims are allowed.

Filter

Stage and subject

Stage

Subject

Clear

Reviewer handoff

Subject-scope review map

Use this to assign expert reviewers by stage and subject, starting with blocked and revision-needed scopes before untouched pending maps.

1 subject scopes open

0 subject scopes approved

Open scope acceptance state

Next actions

Send 8 pending concept(s) to subject experts in traceable batches.
Prioritize 1 subject scope(s) still open before making production trust claims.

Priority subject	Approved	Open	Status mix	Next action	Pack
GCSE / Key Stage 4 / Mathematics	0/8 (0%)	8	8 pending 0 revision 0 blocked	Send the open concept batch to a subject expert for review.	Open

Reviewer batch

Prioritized expert review slice

Export a small batch of blocked, revision-needed and pending concepts so reviewers can work through a traceable set without handling the full curriculum map at once.

8 items in batch

8 open in scope

0 blocked first

0 revision-needed next

Batch reference: curriculum-review-batch:gcse:mathematics:limit-12:open-8

Use this reference in evidence links when recording returned decisions, importing reviewer decisions or drafting subject-expert validation evidence.

Sign in to export a reviewer batch.

Reviewer work order

Expert review assignment

Use the work order when sending a traceable curriculum slice to a subject expert. It combines the batch, return protocol, acceptance rules and import template without exposing learner data.

8 assigned concepts

8 open in scope

0% scope reviewed

Open trust claim

Return protocol

Inspect each concept: Check objective, age scope, prerequisites, misconceptions, representative problem, mastery signals, remediation, extension and progression links.
Record a decision: Use approved only when the concept can support trusted teaching for the stated stage and subject; otherwise use needs_revision or blocked.
Write traceable notes: Every decision needs reviewer_name, reviewer_role, confidence and alignment_notes; correction_notes should explain what to repair.
Return the decision JSON: Return the completed decision_import_template with the batch_reference intact so Aristotle can validate the whole batch before saving.
Create validation evidence after coverage: After all concepts in scope are approved, create subject-expert validation evidence with external or real-world attestation.

Required attestation

Reviewer identity and role: Every decision identifies an accountable teacher, subject expert, safeguarding reviewer or curriculum lead.
External or real-world attestation: The accepted validation record confirms evidence is external or real-world and not synthetic-only.
Validation registry acceptance: A subject-expert review record is accepted with no open handoff gaps before a production trust claim is made.

The work order contains curriculum map content, review status and decision fields only; it excludes learner profiles, names, raw answers, guardian details, emails, session keys and access codes.

Reviewer return checklist

Concept decisions approve, revise or block curriculum items. The subject-expert validation return separately confirms the reviewed scope can support production trust claims.

Subject expert reviewer

reviewer_confirmed_external_or_real_world
reviewer_confirmed_not_synthetic_only
reviewer_confirmed_age_scope_reviewed
reviewer_confirmed_work_order_and_pack_reviewed
reviewer_confirmed_scope_matches_gate
reviewer_confirmed_ready_for_acceptance
full_scope_reviewed - Reviewer confirms the submitted scope covers the subject, stage, concepts, prerequisites, misconceptions, rubrics, remediation and progression links named by the gate.
production_trust_ready - Reviewer confirms the reviewed content can support production trust claims for the submitted scope, or has named every required change.

Work order: /curriculum/review-work-order.json?stage=gcse&subject=mathematics&limit=12
Evidence: /curriculum/review-pack.json?stage=gcse&subject=mathematics
Review brief: /validation/review-request/subject_expert_review/
Return template: /validation/review-return-template.json?request=subject_expert_review
Registry: /validation/?request=subject_expert_review#record-evidence

Review brief Return template Registry

Returned decisions

Import expert review batch

Paste a completed decision JSON from a subject expert. Aristotle validates every decision before saving, so a malformed or unknown concept leaves the review trail unchanged.

Sign in to import returned expert review decisions.

Sign in

Validation draft

Subject expert evidence record

Create a non-counting draft in the validation registry for the current review scope. A draft helps reviewers trace the pack, status and remaining risk without marking the Definition of Done complete.

0/8 approved in scope

8 open review items

Open external acceptance state

GCSE / Key Stage 4 / Mathematics curriculum expert review evidence

This draft does not count toward the external gate until accepted in the validation registry. 8 concepts in scope still need approval before this scope can support trust claims.

Sign in to draft validation evidence for this review scope.

Open review work